falbalafaireyfashionblog

July 17, 2012

~*The Tribe*~

Filed under: Archive, EMOtions, Fashion, Finesmith, MESH — Tags: , , , , , — falbalafaireyfashionblog @ 8:51 pm

The English word tribe occurs in 12th-century Middle English literature as referring to one of the Twelve Tribes of Israel. The word is from Old French tribu, in turn from Latin tribus, referring to the original tripartite ethnic division of the Roman state: Ramnes (Ramnenses), Tities (Titienses), and Luceres, corresponding, according to Varro, to the Latins, Sabines, and Etruscans respectively. The Ramnes were named after Romulus, leader of the Latins, Tities after Tatius, leader of the Sabines, and Luceres after Lucumo, leader of an Etruscan army that had assisted the Latins. According to Livy, the three tribes were in fact squadrons of knights, rather than ethnic divisions. The term’s ultimate etymology is uncertain, perhaps from the Proto-Indo-European roots *tri- (“three”) and *bhew- (“to be”).[9]

In 242–240 BC, the Tribal Assembly (comitia tributa) in the Roman Republic was organized in 35 Tribes (four “Urban Tribes” and 31 “Rural Tribes”). The Latin word as used in the Bible translates as Greek phyle “race, tribe, clan” and ultimately the Hebrew שבט ([ʃevæt]) or “sceptre“. In the historical sense, “tribe,” “race” and “clan” can be used interchangeably.

The term’s origin might be found with the Latin word for three, tres. The dative and ablative case forms of this word are both tribus. The word tribus could therefore mean “from the three” or “for the three.”

Evolution

Considerable debate takes place over how best to characterize tribes. This partly stems from perceived differences between pre-state tribes and contemporary tribes; some reflects more general controversy over cultural evolution and colonialism. In the popular imagination, tribes reflect a way of life that predates, and is more “natural“, than that in modern states. Tribes also privilege primordial social ties, are clearly bounded, homogeneous, parochial, and stable. Thus, many believed[who?] that tribes organize links between families (including clans and lineages), and provide them with a social and ideological basis for solidarity that is in some way more limited than that of an “ethnic group” or of a “nation“. Anthropological and ethnohistorical research has challenged all of these notions.

Anthropologist Elman Service presented a system of classification for societies in all human cultures based on the evolution of social inequality and the role of the state. This system of classification contains four categories:

  1. Gatherer-hunter bands, which are generally egalitarian.
  2. Tribal societies in which there are some limited instances of social rank and prestige (see Chiefdom).
  3. Stratified tribal societies led by chieftains.
  4. Civilizations, with complex social hierarchies and organized, institutional governments.

In his 1975 study, The Notion of the Tribe, anthropologist Morton H. Fried provided numerous examples of tribes the members of which spoke different languages and practised different rituals, or that shared languages and rituals with members of other tribes. Similarly, he provided examples of tribes where people followed different political leaders, or followed the same leaders as members of other tribes. He concluded that tribes in general are characterized by fluid boundaries and heterogeneity, are not parochial, and are dynamic.[10]

Fried, however, proposed that most contemporary tribes do not have their origin in pre-state tribes, but rather in pre-state bands. Such “secondary” tribes, he suggested, actually came about as modern products of state expansion. Bands comprise small, mobile, and fluid social formations with weak leadership, that do not generate surpluses, pay no taxes and support no standing army. Fried argued that secondary tribes develop in one of two ways. First, states could set them up as means to extend administrative and economic influence in their hinterland, where direct political control costs too much. States would encourage (or require) people on their frontiers to form more clearly bounded and centralized polities, because such polities could begin producing surpluses and taxes, and would have a leadership responsive to the needs of neighboring states (the so-called “scheduled” tribes of the United States or of British India provide good examples of this). Second, bands could form “secondary” tribes as a means to defend themselves against state expansion. Members of bands would form more clearly bounded and centralized polities, because such polities could begin producing surpluses that could support a standing army that could fight against states, and they would have a leadership that could co-ordinate economic production and military activities.

In some countries, such as the United States of America and India, tribes are polities that have been granted legal recognition and limited autonomy by the state.

Archeologists continue to explore the development of pre-state tribes. Current research suggests that tribal structures constituted one type of adaptation to situations providing plentiful yet unpredictable resources. Such structures proved flexible enough to coordinate production and distribution of food in times of scarcity, without limiting or constraining people during times of surplus.

I am so happy to do this post with my dear friend Mariella Spitteler (Miss Virtual Hawaii 2012) in this very wild stylings and the awesome new Tattoos by Julie Hastings of White Widdow.

I wanted to show in this doublepost how great this tattoos can be seen on a pale and an ebony skin as well with absolute no lost of quality and fascination and I absolte love Marie’s skincolor and so I asked her for it and she said yes! Thank you so so much Marie and Julie for being in my post and for this bodytattoo’s.

To see Mariella’s credits on BOSL Blog click HERE!

—————————————————————–

Credits on Falbala:

~BodyTattoo: [White~Widow] Apocalypto

(available in different options to add, shirt, pant, underwear and tattoolayer)

~Shirt, Skirt, Arm&Legparts: .:EMO-tions:. – *TERRA NOVA*

~Legwamers: .:EMO-tions:. – *SOUL OF NATURE* set

~Hair: .:EMO-tions:. – * AMANDINE* black

~Jewelry: FINESMITH – BACK TO NATURE

~Nails: [FEMALE  [MANDALA]NAIL PALETTE 1/Super Long]

~Feet: *GaeLine* – Bare Feet – Tip Toe *MESH*

——————————————————————

Credits on Mariella:

~BodyTattoo: [White~Widow] Hannibal

(available in different options to add, shirt, pant, underwear and tattoolayer)

~Shirt, Skirt, Arm&Legparts, bird: *{SeVered Garden} Tala

~Hair:  LELUTKA: SALOME hair (available at HAIRFAIR)

~Jewelry: EARTHSTONES KAIYA

~Feet: N-Core Feet

~ACCEsSORY (Arrow etc): AK RainBow Hunter v2.0 boxed

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Hikaru Enimo

Male Fashionista

Modelesque 2 life

Fashion is not about looking back, Its about looking Forward

B.B.'s Closet

B. yourself... B. original... Trends last a moment, fashion is wearable art. Style however is all about what you bring to the table and showing your originality with the product that is readily available to not only you but the masses. We all have style, don't ever be intimidated or fearful of displaying your own. If others are not pleased with your style, well that is ok because they have the opportunity to have their own style . You rock on and always B. an original! XOXO B.B.

Dress Up Dailey

The likes and loves of a little dragon in Second Life:)

ChocolatesandRaspberries

Life inspired by Style, Travel and Friends.

%d bloggers like this: